INSIGHT AS TO WHY
IS MODERN DAY
Shalom dearly beloved brethren and called-out sheep in general, may Yahweh's grace and mercy be upon you always.
It's actually very simple to see a link between Roman Christianity and Esau, through mere language concerns, aside from the known migrations recorded in history of part of this tribe to "the west" (particularly to southern Italy and some of its islands). In fact, at the time of Yahwsha when the land of Palestine was a mere province of the Roman Empire, the king appointed by the romans to govern Israel, Herod, was an edomite.
But that is not all.
Going backward through languages, "JESUS" becomes "ESAU" in Hebrew!
Brethren, try to follow the logic here; we're going to use the same logical flow, only in reverse:
Whenever we see discussions on the difference between "Yahusha" and "Jesus," it's important to realize it is somewhat like comparing apples with oranges. One is Hebrew, the other is Greek. We know the Sacred Name of our Savior was prophesied at ZekarYah, chapter 3, "Yahusha."
If we were to start with the Hebrew, we would never arrive at "Jesus" going from Greek and then Latin, as it is claimed. Only if we force the facts to suit our personal ambitions.
But, if we start with Jesus, and then back-track to Hebrew, we go from the ancient Latin form IESU to the Greek IESOUS, and find the closest Hebrew name to be ESU (AYIN-SHIN-UAU). IESU and ESU are about as close as it gets. Plus, the 7th century Arabic form for IESU and for ESU is ISA---which many muslims still use when naming the person they describe as a prophet and which corresponds to the christian "Jesus."
Brethren, astoningshly the Hebrew "ESU" (meaning "hairy") is the very same name of YaAkob's twin brother, a.k.a., "ESAU"!